Difference between revisions of "Volokhov Criterion"

From MSY Archives
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Note to self: Don't drink and edit. And yet I do. No-one said I was spectacularly reasonable or decent when clothed in the veils of wine and vodka)
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
After [[Vladimir Volokhov]] and [[Laplace]] made the mathematical break-through of providing proof and falsifiability of encoding human morals and—to a certain degree—sensibilities in an artificial intelligence, the '''Volokhov criterion''' was used as a kind of measurement to what degree an artificial intelligence or (starkly) augmentented human was congruent with human sensibilities of morale and ethics. If the criterion wasn't met in humans, they were to be more heavily reintegrated into into their bodies, whereas [[Artificial Intelligence]]s were subjected to reprogramming (not unlike retirement reprogramming, but compulsory) to adhere to the mortal and human but still sensible morals.
+
After [[Vladimir Volokhov]] and [[Laplace]] made the mathematical break-through of providing proof and falsifiability of encoding human morals and—to a certain degree—sensibilities in an artificial intelligence, the '''Volokhov criterion''' was used as a kind of measurement to what degree an artificial intelligence or (starkly) augmentented human was congruent with human sensibilities of morale and ethics. If the criterion wasn't met in humans, they were to be more heavily reintegrated into into their bodies, whereas Artificial Intelligences were subjected to reprogramming (not unlike retirement reprogramming, but compulsory) to adhere to the mortal and human but still sensible morals.
  
 
[[Category:Artificial Intelligence]]
 
[[Category:Artificial Intelligence]]

Revision as of 17:25, 24 February 2017

After Vladimir Volokhov and Laplace made the mathematical break-through of providing proof and falsifiability of encoding human morals and—to a certain degree—sensibilities in an artificial intelligence, the Volokhov criterion was used as a kind of measurement to what degree an artificial intelligence or (starkly) augmentented human was congruent with human sensibilities of morale and ethics. If the criterion wasn't met in humans, they were to be more heavily reintegrated into into their bodies, whereas Artificial Intelligences were subjected to reprogramming (not unlike retirement reprogramming, but compulsory) to adhere to the mortal and human but still sensible morals.